Compare · Greenhouse
Greenhouse alternative for screening, without buying a full ATS
Greenhouse is the gold-standard applicant tracking system for structured hiring at scale. Structured interviewing, scorecards, interview kits, DEI features, deep reporting and a very large integration ecosystem are all genuinely excellent, and plenty of talent teams should buy it. Two things about it shape the comparison. Greenhouse does not publish prices at all: there are three tiers, Core, Plus and Pro, and pricing is customized based on your company's hiring needs, quoted through a sales conversation or demo, varying with hiring volume, org complexity and features, on annual contracts. It is also, by design, a system of record for the whole funnel rather than a tool for reading resumes.
Held for recruiter review · never auto-rejected
Screen the pile to watch Prescreener parse every resume, apply your criteria and knockouts, and rank the inbound applicants with a transparent reason on each.
Live, interactive · AI assists, you decide · no signup needed
AI assists · you decide · bias-audited (EEOC / NYC Local Law 144)
Greenhouse is a premium ATS built for structured hiring at scale, quoted by sales. Prescreener is a screening layer with published pricing that reads and ranks the inbound resume pile, and runs alongside Greenhouse or any other ATS.
Prescreener is the other thing entirely. It is a screening layer, not an ATS, and it does the job that sits before every structured interview: reading the hundreds of inbound resumes per role, applying your knockout and eligibility criteria, asking short screening questions, scoring role-fit, and ranking the pile so recruiters review only the top matches, each with the reasons behind its place. Pricing is public (Starter $199, Growth $499, Scale $1,290 per month) and setup takes days, not a quarter. If you need Greenhouse's structured interview kits and reporting, buy Greenhouse. If you need the pile read and ranked, buy the layer that does that, and run it alongside whatever ATS you already have.
Side by side
Greenhouse vs Prescreener, honestly
A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.
| What matters | Prescreener | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A screening layer that reads, scores and ranks the inbound applicant pile | A premium ATS for structured hiring: scorecards, interview kits, DEI features, deep reporting |
| Reads and ranks the whole inbound pile | Yes. Every resume is parsed, knockouts applied, role-fit scored, pile ranked with reasons | Structures what happens after a candidate is already in your pipeline |
| Pricing transparency | Published: Starter $199, Growth $499, Scale $1,290 per month. No free plan | Not published. Core, Plus and Pro quoted by sales, based on hiring needs, annual contracts |
| Setup time | Connect, set your criteria and start receiving a ranked pile in days | An ATS implementation, typically after a demo and a sales conversation |
| Works alongside your existing ATS | Yes. Not a system of record, so it runs next to Greenhouse or any other ATS | It is the system of record, with a very large integration ecosystem around it |
| Bias audit and human-in-the-loop | AI disclosure, bias audits supporting EEOC and NYC Local Law 144, never auto-rejects | Structured, scorecard-driven interviewing and DEI reporting across the funnel |
Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.
Why teams pick Prescreener
One step that screens the whole inbound pile
The step Greenhouse leaves to you
Greenhouse structures the interview process brilliantly. Someone still has to read the 400 resumes that arrive before it. Prescreener is the tool for that step, and it hands over a ranked shortlist.
You can see the price
Starter is $199 per month, Growth $499, Scale $1,290, published on our pricing page. No demo required before you know what it costs, and no annual contract needed to find out.
Keep Greenhouse if you need it
Structured interview kits, scorecards and reporting are real reasons to buy Greenhouse. Prescreener sits in front of it, with AI disclosure, bias audits and a recruiter making every decision.
Good questions
Greenhouse vs Prescreener, answered
More comparisons
See how Prescreener compares
BambooHR alternative
Keep your HR system of record. Buy the screening layer that reads the pile.
vs FountainFountain alternative
Keep your hiring stack. Buy the screening layer that reads the pile.
vs WorkdayWorkday alternative
Keep the system of record. Buy the screening layer that reads the pile.
vs iCIMSiCIMS alternative
Buy the screening layer, not another enterprise platform you have to implement.
vs HireVueHireVue alternative
A focused, screening-first layer that ranks your inbound resume pile, without the enterprise weight.
vs CVViZCVViZ alternative
Transparent ranked-pile reasons and bias audits, working alongside the ATS you already run.
vs Sapia.aiSapia.ai alternative
Screens the resume pile up front, the step before interviews, and ranks with reasons.
vs ManatalManatal alternative
Screening-first ranking of the inbound pile, not another system of record.
vs WorkableWorkable alternative
If the real problem is 400 resumes per role, you do not need to buy a whole ATS to fix it.
vs LeverLever alternative
Published pricing and a ranked inbound pile, without buying an ATS and CRM you did not ask for.
vs SmartRecruitersSmartRecruiters alternative
Enterprise screening at an enterprise entry price, or the same ranked pile for $199 a month.
vs JazzHRJazzHR alternative
JazzHR tracks the applications. Prescreener reads them and tells you who to call first.
vs ParadoxParadox alternative
A screening-first layer that reads and ranks every resume, with transparent reasons and published pricing.
vs AshbyAshby alternative
Screening-first ranking that works alongside Ashby or any ATS, without becoming your system of record.
vs Breezy HRBreezy HR alternative
AI screening that ranks your inbound pile with reasons, working alongside the ATS you already run.
vs EightfoldEightfold alternative
A focused, fast-to-start screening layer that ranks your inbound pile, without an enterprise talent-intelligence rollout.
vs hireEZhireEZ alternative
For teams drowning in inbound applications, not hunting passive candidates: rank the pile you already have.
vs PinpointPinpoint alternative
Keep the ATS you already run and add a screening layer, instead of replacing your whole hiring system.
See how Prescreener screens candidates faster
One step that parses every inbound resume, scores role-fit and ranks the pile, shaped to your roles and your ATS. Prescreener ranks and flags candidates, your team makes every hiring decision.
Consistent criteria · bias-audited to EEOC and LL144 · human-in-the-loop