Ranking · ATS resume screening
ATS resume screening that actually ranks the pile
Your ATS calls it resume screening, but mostly it lets you tag, stage, and search applications by hand. The reading, the must-have checks, and the judgment about who to review first are still entirely on the recruiter, and that is where the hours and the inconsistency live.
Parse · score · rank · recruiter reviews
Held for recruiter review · never auto-rejected
Screen the pile to watch Prescreener parse every resume, apply your criteria and knockouts, and rank the inbound applicants with a transparent reason on each.
Live, interactive · AI assists, you decide · no signup needed
AI assists · you decide · bias-audited (EEOC / NYC Local Law 144)
Human-in-the-loop you decide
EEOC and LL144 bias-audited
Prescreener adds genuine resume screening to your ATS. Layered alongside Greenhouse, Lever, or Workable, it reads every resume in the pile, applies your knockout and eligibility criteria, scores role-fit, and ranks candidates with transparent reasons. Your ATS stays the system of record while recruiters open a prioritized shortlist instead of an unsorted stage. A human makes every decision, nothing is auto-rejected, and the screening is bias-audited for EEOC and NYC Local Law 144 with candidate consent and AI disclosure.
Why it works
What your team gets with ATS resume screening
Fills the ATS gap
It adds the reading, scoring, and ranking your ATS does not do, so the screening stage becomes a ranked shortlist instead of an unsorted pile.
ATS stays in charge
Greenhouse, Lever, or Workable remains your system of record, while Prescreener handles the screen alongside it without a migration.
Reasons recruiters trust
Each ranking carries a transparent reason tied to your criteria, so the order is explainable inside the ATS workflow your team already uses.
What it handles
Parsed, scored and ranked on autopilot
Prescreener reads every inbound resume, applies your knockout and eligibility criteria, asks the screening questions you set, scores role-fit against consistent criteria, and ranks the applicant pile so your recruiters review the top matches first.
- Layers screening onto Greenhouse, Lever, or Workable
- Reads every resume and applies your knockout criteria
- Scores role-fit and ranks the pile with transparent reasons
- Keeps your ATS as the system of record
- Bias-audited for EEOC and NYC Local Law 144 with human review
Why Prescreener
One step that screens the whole inbound pile
Not a full ATS, not a six-figure assessment suite, and not a staffing agency. Parse, score, rank and hand off in one place, shaped to the criteria you already hire on.
Reads every resume
Prescreener parses every inbound application, applies your knockout and eligibility criteria, and asks the screening questions you set. Applicants consent and are told AI is screening their application, so no qualified person sits in a backlog for days.
Scores role-fit consistently
Every applicant is scored against the same criteria, with a transparent reason on each candidate, so the pile is compared consistently and the scoring stays bias-audited against EEOC guidance and NYC Local Law 144.
Ranks the pile
The strongest matches rise to the top of a ranked pile your recruiters review first. Prescreener never auto-rejects, it ranks and flags candidates for review, and your team makes every decision.
Good questions
Questions about ATS resume screening
Explore more
More ways hiring teams screen with Prescreener
Resume ranking software
Resume ranking software with a transparent reason behind every position.
Learn moreApplicant tracking system screening
The AI screening layer that ranks your inbound pile alongside your ATS.
Learn moreResume parser
A resume parser that does not stop at fields. It scores and ranks too.
Learn moreStop reading the inbound pile by hand. Put screening on autopilot.
Set your role and criteria and Prescreener parses every inbound resume, scores role-fit, and ranks the pile for your team. Prescreener ranks and flags candidates, your recruiters make every hiring decision.
Consistent criteria · bias-audited to EEOC and LL144 · human-in-the-loop