Ranking · Candidate scoring software
Candidate scoring software that is consistent and defensible
Candidate scoring breaks down the moment two reviewers grade the same resume differently. Without a shared, explicit set of criteria, a score reflects the reviewer's mood and instincts as much as the candidate, and the numbers cannot be compared or defended.
Parse · score · rank · recruiter reviews
Held for recruiter review · never auto-rejected
Screen the pile to watch Prescreener parse every resume, apply your criteria and knockouts, and rank the inbound applicants with a transparent reason on each.
Live, interactive · AI assists, you decide · no signup needed
AI assists · you decide · bias-audited (EEOC / NYC Local Law 144)
Human-in-the-loop you decide
EEOC and LL144 bias-audited
Prescreener brings consistent candidate scoring to the inbound pile. It reads every resume, applies your knockout and eligibility criteria, and scores role-fit against the same defined rubric for every candidate, then ranks the pile with a transparent reason behind each score. Recruiters review the ranked results and make every decision, since nothing is auto-rejected. The scoring is bias-audited for EEOC and NYC Local Law 144 and runs with candidate consent and AI disclosure, so the numbers hold up under scrutiny.
Why it works
What your team gets with candidate scoring software
One rubric for all
Every candidate is scored on the same defined criteria, so the scores are comparable across the pile rather than shaped by who reviewed whom.
Reason per score
Each score links to the criteria and resume evidence behind it, so a number is explainable rather than something you have to trust blindly.
Scores feed the rank
Role-fit scores drive the ranking, so the prioritized shortlist is a direct, auditable result of the criteria you set.
What it handles
Parsed, scored and ranked on autopilot
Prescreener reads every inbound resume, applies your knockout and eligibility criteria, asks the screening questions you set, scores role-fit against consistent criteria, and ranks the applicant pile so your recruiters review the top matches first.
- Scores every candidate on the same role-fit criteria
- Links each score to its criteria and resume evidence
- Ranks the pile from the scores with transparent reasons
- Lets recruiters review and decide on every candidate
- Bias-audited for EEOC and NYC Local Law 144 with candidate consent
Why Prescreener
One step that screens the whole inbound pile
Not a full ATS, not a six-figure assessment suite, and not a staffing agency. Parse, score, rank and hand off in one place, shaped to the criteria you already hire on.
Reads every resume
Prescreener parses every inbound application, applies your knockout and eligibility criteria, and asks the screening questions you set. Applicants consent and are told AI is screening their application, so no qualified person sits in a backlog for days.
Scores role-fit consistently
Every applicant is scored against the same criteria, with a transparent reason on each candidate, so the pile is compared consistently and the scoring stays bias-audited against EEOC guidance and NYC Local Law 144.
Ranks the pile
The strongest matches rise to the top of a ranked pile your recruiters review first. Prescreener never auto-rejects, it ranks and flags candidates for review, and your team makes every decision.
Good questions
Questions about candidate scoring software
Explore more
More ways hiring teams screen with Prescreener
Resume ranking software
Resume ranking software with a transparent reason behind every position.
Learn moreApplicant tracking system screening
The AI screening layer that ranks your inbound pile alongside your ATS.
Learn moreResume parser
A resume parser that does not stop at fields. It scores and ranks too.
Learn moreStop reading the inbound pile by hand. Put screening on autopilot.
Set your role and criteria and Prescreener parses every inbound resume, scores role-fit, and ranks the pile for your team. Prescreener ranks and flags candidates, your recruiters make every hiring decision.
Consistent criteria · bias-audited to EEOC and LL144 · human-in-the-loop