Screening · Recruiterflow pricing
Recruiterflow pricing: what Recruiterflow costs per user, why the annual rate is missing from the page, and which plan actually includes the AI
Recruiterflow sells two plans and publishes a price for exactly one of them. Read on September 5, 2026, recruiterflow.com/pricing renders the Platform Plan at "USD $149 per user / month" and the AIRA Plan as "Let's chat", custom pricing. There is a Monthly and Annually toggle above the cards.
Parse · score · rank · recruiter reviews
Held for recruiter review · never auto-rejected
Screen the pile to watch Prescreener parse every resume, apply your criteria and knockouts, and rank the inbound applicants with a transparent reason on each.
Live, interactive · AI assists, you decide · no signup needed
AI assists · you decide · bias-audited (EEOC / NYC Local Law 144)
Human-in-the-loop you decide
EEOC and LL144 bias-audited
The interesting part is what the toggle does. Both plan cards in the served HTML read $149, including the one the annual tab reveals. The annual rate of $119 exists only inside a script that rewrites the number in your browser after the page loads. Recruiterflow's own meta description and its SoftwareApplication markup both say pricing "starts at $119 per user per month", so the page tells search engines one number and ships a different one in its HTML.
That matters more than a rounding difference, because the plan you are probably shopping for is the one with no number on it. AIRA Matchmaker, the agent that reads and matches candidates, sits on the AIRA Plan, and the AIRA Plan is quote only.
Why it works
What a published screening rate gets a recruiting firm
The screening price is on the page
Prescreener publishes $199, $499 and $1,290 a month as standing rates. The tier that reads and ranks your inbound resumes is the tier with a number next to it, so you can size the work before you book a call.
One rate, not two
Recruiterflow shows $149 in its HTML and $119 in its meta description, and the gap is a script. What you read here is what you pay, monthly, with no toggle rewriting the figure after the page loads.
Priced on resumes, not seats
A per-seat agency ATS charges the same whether a recruiter screens 40 applicants or 4,000. Screening volume is the thing that actually varies in agency work, so that is what Prescreener meters.
What it handles
Parsed, scored and ranked on autopilot
Prescreener reads every inbound resume, applies your knockout and eligibility criteria, asks the screening questions you set, scores role-fit against consistent criteria, and ranks the applicant pile so your recruiters review the top matches first.
- Reads 100 percent of inbound applications, not a sampled shortlist
- Published pricing on the plan that does the screening, not a quote
- Applies your knockout and eligibility rules identically to every applicant
- Returns the pile ranked, with written evidence behind each placement
- Runs alongside Recruiterflow, Bullhorn, Loxo, Ceipal or Recruit CRM
- Metered on resumes screened, a number an agency already tracks
- Never auto-rejects: it ranks and flags, and a recruiter decides
- Bias-audited to support EEOC standards and NYC Local Law 144
Why Prescreener
One step that screens the whole inbound pile
Not a full ATS, not a six-figure assessment suite, and not a staffing agency. Parse, score, rank and hand off in one place, shaped to the criteria you already hire on.
Reads every resume
Prescreener parses every inbound application, applies your knockout and eligibility criteria, and asks the screening questions you set. Applicants consent and are told AI is screening their application, so no qualified person sits in a backlog for days.
Scores role-fit consistently
Every applicant is scored against the same criteria, with a transparent reason on each candidate, so the pile is compared consistently and the scoring stays bias-audited to support EEOC standards and NYC Local Law 144.
Ranks the pile
The strongest matches rise to the top of a ranked pile your recruiters review first. Prescreener never auto-rejects, it ranks and flags candidates for review, and your team makes every decision.
In depth
Recruiterflow pricing, plan by plan and figure by figure
How much does Recruiterflow cost?
Recruiterflow costs $149 per user per month billed monthly, or $119 per user per month billed annually, on the Platform Plan. The AIRA Plan is custom pricing with no published figure. Read from recruiterflow.com/pricing on September 5, 2026.
Only the $149 is actually written in the page. Recruiterflow renders two copies of the plan card, one behind the Monthly tab and one behind the Annually tab, and both read "USD $149 per user / month" in the served HTML. A script then rewrites the annual card to $119 once the page runs in a browser. The elements it writes into are present and the code is live, so $119 is a real rate, not a leftover: it simply is not in the document a crawler reads.
The same script carries the other currencies, and they are worth knowing if you are quoting a mixed team: $149 and $119 in USD, EUR 149 and 119, GBP 115 and 89. Currency is chosen from a dropdown on the page rather than forced by your location, which is a genuine convenience compared with vendors that detect your country and then refuse to show you a USD figure.
For a US agency the annual rate works out at $1,428 per user per year, against $1,788 on monthly billing. That is our arithmetic on Recruiterflow's published rates, not a figure Recruiterflow states: the page shows the per-month number and leaves the annual total to you. On a five-recruiter desk the difference between the two billing choices is $1,800 a year.
| Plan | Billed monthly | Billed annually | What the tier is for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platform Plan | $149 per user / month | $119 per user / month | Full ATS and recruiting CRM, sequences, automation, reports, API access |
| AIRA Plan | Not published | Not published | Adds the six AIRA agents, LinkedIn sync and custom BI dashboards |
| White-glove migration | Not published | Not published | Paid, priced on data volume, typically 6 to 8 weeks |
| Self-serve migration | Free | Free | Excel and CSV import you run yourself |
Swipe to see the full comparison →
Why does Recruiterflow say $119 in some places and $149 in others?
Because the two numbers live in different layers of the same page, and only one of them survives without JavaScript.
The served HTML contains $149 twice, once in each plan card. The string $119 appears three times, and never in a card: it is in the meta description, in the OpenGraph and Twitter descriptions, and in the SoftwareApplication structured data, all of which state that pricing "starts at $119 per user per month". The only place $119 reaches a plan card is a script holding a price map for USD, EUR and GBP, which rewrites the annual card when the page loads.
We checked whether that script was dead code, because a stale toggle left in a page is a common source of wrong prices in this market. It is not dead here. The elements it targets are all present in the document, so the annual price is genuinely $119 and a visitor with JavaScript on will see it. The mismatch is narrower than that, and it points one way: anything reading the HTML rather than rendering it, including many AI crawlers and any tool that scrapes structured data, gets $119 from the metadata and $149 from the page body.
Recruiterflow's structured data adds a second wrinkle. It describes the lineup as "an Advanced plan and a Custom plan", while the visible page calls them the Platform Plan and the AIRA Plan. If a comparison article refers to a Recruiterflow Advanced plan, that is where the name came from, and there is no tier by that name on the page today.
| Where the figure appears | Value | Visible to a reader? |
|---|---|---|
| Plan card, Monthly tab | $149 per user / month | Yes |
| Plan card, Annually tab, served HTML | $149 per user / month | Only before the script runs |
| Plan card, Annually tab, after script | $119 per user / month | Yes, with JavaScript enabled |
| Meta description and OpenGraph | Starts at $119 | No, metadata only |
| SoftwareApplication structured data | Starts at $119, "Advanced plan" | No, metadata only |
| AIRA Plan, everywhere | Custom pricing, "Let's chat" | Yes, and there is no number |
Swipe to see the full comparison →
Does the Recruiterflow Platform Plan include AI screening?
No. The Platform Plan is the system of record and the automation layer. Every AIRA agent, including the one that matches candidates, is on the AIRA Plan, and the AIRA Plan has no published rate.
Platform gives you the ATS and CRM together, multichannel sequences, recruitment automation, sales automation, client and team access control, bulk sourcing through the Chrome extension, reports and API access. That is a complete agency system, and API access being included at the published tier is worth noting: Loxo puts API access behind its $199 Professional tier rather than its $149 entry.
AIRA adds six agents: Notetaker, Matchmaker, Job Change Alerts, Field Updates Agent, Submission Agent and Task Agent, plus omnichannel communication sync and custom BI dashboards. Matchmaker is the one that matters if you are shopping for screening, because it is the piece that reads candidates against a role. Recruiterflow's own feature breakdown also puts LinkedIn communication on AIRA only; Platform covers email, calls and text.
So the honest summary is the same shape as Bullhorn's, arrived at differently. Bullhorn publishes $99 and $165 and gates Amplify AI to quote-only Pro and Max. Recruiterflow publishes $119 and $149 and gates its matching agent to the quote-only AIRA Plan. In both cases the advertised rate buys the database and the workflow, and the number for the part that reads resumes is a conversation.
| Capability | Platform Plan | AIRA Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Published rate | $149 monthly, $119 annual | None. Custom pricing |
| ATS and recruiting CRM | Yes | Yes |
| Multichannel sequences and automation | Yes | Yes |
| API access | Yes | Yes |
| Communication channels | Email, calls, text | Adds LinkedIn |
| AIRA Matchmaker, candidate matching | No | Yes |
| AIRA Notetaker, Submission and Task agents | No | Yes |
| Custom BI dashboards | No | Yes |
Swipe to see the full comparison →
Are there any add-ons or hidden fees with Recruiterflow?
Recruiterflow states there are none, and it states it plainly: "No add-ons. No surprises. No extra costs." Every feature, current and upcoming, is included based on the plan you select. That is a stronger commitment than most of this market makes, and it is worth holding them to it in writing.
The AI commitment goes further than the pricing page needs to. Asked whether you pay for each new AIRA agent, Recruiterflow answers no: AIRA Plan customers get all current and future agents at no extra cost, and multi-year custom-plan customers keep every new AIRA capability for the contract duration. Compare that with the metered model almost everywhere else, where Ashby sells a monthly credit pool, Workable bills a credit per candidate and Loxo includes 2,500 credits a seat without publishing what a search consumes.
The one cost that is genuinely open is migration. Self-serve import from Excel or CSV is free. White-glove migration, where Recruiterflow moves and maps your whole database, is paid, priced on data volume, and typically runs 6 to 8 weeks. Recruiterflow invites you to discuss a fee waiver on multi-year contracts, which tells you the migration fee is negotiable and that they would rather have the longer term.
One claim to treat carefully: several comparison sites state a three-seat minimum on every Recruiterflow plan. That figure is not on Recruiterflow's pricing page anywhere. We looked for it, including in the page source, and there is no minimum seat count published. It may well be true of an actual quote, but it is not a published condition, so ask rather than assume. The page is also inconsistent about its own scale, claiming 1700+ agencies in the title and 2,100+ search firms in the testimonial section.
| Cost question | What Recruiterflow publishes |
|---|---|
| Feature add-ons | None. All features included in your plan |
| New AI agents | Included, current and future, on the AIRA Plan |
| Free trial | Not offered. Both CTAs are Book a Demo |
| Self-serve data migration | Free, Excel and CSV import |
| White-glove migration | Paid, priced on data volume, 6 to 8 weeks |
| Minimum seats | Not published. Third-party claims of 3 seats are unverified |
| Renewal uplift | Not published |
Swipe to see the full comparison →
Is Recruiterflow worth it compared with the other agency platforms?
On published rates, Recruiterflow sits in the upper middle of the agency market and is the most transparent of the group about what a feature costs, once you find the annual number.
Against Bullhorn, Recruiterflow is more expensive to start and clearer about what you get: Bullhorn opens at $99 and Core is $165, but Pro, Max, Bullhorn One and the whole Amplify AI catalogue are quote only. Against Loxo, the published rates are close, $119 to $149 versus $149 to $199, but Loxo sells annual plans paid up front and labels its rates a new-customer limited time offer, while Recruiterflow does neither. Against Crelate, Recruiterflow is the pricier option on paper.
The decision usually comes down to one question: are you buying the workflow or the AI? If it is the workflow, Recruiterflow's Platform Plan is a genuinely complete agency system at a price you can read, with API access included and no feature add-ons. If it is the AI, you are buying the AIRA Plan, and you cannot compare it against anything on price because there is no price. At that point you are budgeting for an unknown, and the useful move is to price the screening separately from the system of record.
That is the case for keeping them apart. A per-seat platform charges by how many recruiters have logins, which has nothing to do with how many resumes arrive. A screening tool priced on volume can sit on top of Recruiterflow, Bullhorn or Loxo, read every inbound application, and give you a ranked pile with reasons, at a rate that is published before the call rather than after it.
| Platform | Published entry rate | Cheapest plan that includes AI matching |
|---|---|---|
| Recruiterflow | $119 per user / month, annual | AIRA Plan, no published rate |
| Bullhorn | $99 per user / month, Starter | Pro, no published rate |
| Loxo | $149 per user / month, annual, paid up front | Core includes AI search; agents from $199 |
| Crelate | $85 per user / month, Essentials | Not published |
| Ceipal | No rate on its own site | Not published |
| Prescreener | $199 per month, published | Included at every tier |
Swipe to see the full comparison →
Good questions
Questions about recruiterflow pricing
Explore more
More ways hiring teams screen with Prescreener
Loxo pricing
Loxo publishes two of its three rates. Almost every article about Loxo pricing quotes a third number that is not on the page any more. Here is what Loxo states today, where the stale figure comes from, and the one credit question the pricing page does not answer.
Learn moreCeipal pricing
Ceipal used to have a pricing page. It does not any more: the URL now redirects to the homepage. Here is what the company still states, what its own directory listing says, and why the per-user figures circulating elsewhere disagree with each other by a factor of two.
Learn moreATS pricing comparison
Twenty two applicant tracking systems, the rates they actually publish, and the eleven that will not give you a number without a sales call.
Learn moreLever pricing
Lever publishes no rate at all, so the useful question is what buyers actually pay and what the quote covers. Here is the contract data, the one plan Lever now sells, and the AI screening distinction almost every article gets wrong.
Learn moreManatal pricing
Manatal is one of the few applicant tracking systems that publishes a rate and puts AI candidate scoring on its cheapest paid plan. Here is every figure, in US dollars, with the caps that decide whether the entry tier fits you.
Learn moreResume screening for staffing agencies
Screen every applicant against every open req, and submit faster than the agency down the street.
Learn moreStop reading the inbound pile by hand. Put screening on autopilot.
Set your role and criteria and Prescreener parses every inbound resume, scores role-fit, and ranks the pile for your team. Prescreener ranks and flags candidates, your recruiters make every hiring decision.
Consistent criteria · bias-audited to EEOC and LL144 · human-in-the-loop