Screening · Metaview pricing
Metaview pricing for Application Review, Sourcing and Notetaker
Metaview prices each agent separately. Its pricing page has tabs for Sourcing, Application Review, Notetaker and an all-agents suite, and you pay only for the agents you switch on. We read every tab on October 31, 2026.
Confirm your work email, add up to 3 of your own resumes, see them ranked with reasons
Held for recruiter review · never auto-rejected
Screen the pile to watch Prescreener parse every resume, apply your criteria and knockouts, and rank the inbound applicants with a transparent reason on each.
Live, interactive · AI assists, you decide · no signup needed
AI assists · you decide · impact ratio reports for your bias audit
Human-in-the-loop you decide
Impact ratio reports for your audit
Application Review is the agent that screens inbound candidates. It has a free tier of 50 applications a month with basic screening, and a Pro tier at $150 a month for 500 reviews a month with unlimited users and advanced AI evaluation. Sourcing runs from a free first 100 profiles to Pro at $100 a month per user for 200 profiles a month, and Max at $300 a month per user for unlimited profiles. Notetaker has a free tier of 25 calls a month and Pro at $60 a month per user with unlimited calls. Enterprise and the all-agents platform are priced by quote.
Two details change the real cost. Application Review is metered by review, not by seat, so a busy requisition can use up the 500 quickly, and the page does not say what happens above the allowance. Sourcing and Notetaker are metered per user, so cost grows with the size of the recruiting team instead.
If your need is an inbound pile, Prescreener is a narrower purchase with published pricing by applicant volume. It reads every inbound resume, ranks it with written evidence per criterion and leaves the decision with a person. It does not source candidates or record interviews.
Why it works
Work out cost per review before you choose an agent
Know which agent you are buying
Sourcing, Application Review and Notetaker are three different purchases with three different meters. Price only the one that solves your bottleneck, then add others later.
Evidence for every applicant
Prescreener reads and ranks every inbound resume with written evidence per criterion. Recruiters review the ranking and decide, and Prescreener never auto-rejects.
A screening number you can budget
Prescreener costs $199, $499, $1,290 or $2,490 a month by applicant volume, or half that billed yearly. Starter is about $99 a month billed yearly for 1,000 resumes ranked monthly.
What it handles
Parsed, scored and ranked on autopilot
Prescreener reads every inbound resume, applies your knockout and eligibility criteria, asks the screening questions you set, scores role-fit against consistent criteria, and ranks the applicant pile so your recruiters review the top matches first.
- Lists every Metaview figure that is published, agent by agent
- Turns the 500 review allowance into a cost per review you can compare
- Separates per-user agents from the per-review Application Review meter
- Shows what Metaview does not publish, including Enterprise and the all-agents suite
- Gives you a flat resume screening price from Prescreener to hold beside it
- Keeps people responsible for screening decisions because Prescreener never auto-rejects
Why Prescreener
One step that screens the whole inbound pile
Not a full ATS, not a six-figure assessment suite, and not a staffing agency. Parse, score, rank and hand off in one place, shaped to the criteria you already hire on.
Reads every resume
Prescreener parses every inbound application, applies your knockout and eligibility criteria, and asks the screening questions you set. Applicants consent and are told AI is screening their application, so no qualified person sits in a backlog for days.
Scores role-fit consistently
Every applicant is scored against the same criteria, with a transparent reason on each candidate, so the pile is compared consistently and the scoring comes with impact ratio reports for your EEOC and NYC Local Law 144 audit work.
Ranks the pile
The strongest matches rise to the top of a ranked pile your recruiters review first. Prescreener never auto-rejects, it ranks and flags candidates for review, and your team makes every decision.
In depth
Metaview pricing evidence and what to ask before you buy
How much does Metaview cost?
It depends on the agent. The pricing page lets you choose Sourcing, Application Review, Notetaker or all agents, and each tab shows its own plans. The page also says every user gets access to the full platform but you only pay for the agents you use.
The all-agents tab is the Agentic Recruiting Platform, which shows custom pricing and a Speak to Sales button. There is no published figure for running every agent together, so a team that wants the full suite is back to a quote.
| Agent | Plan | Published price |
|---|---|---|
| Application Review | Free | $0, 50 applications a month, basic screening |
| Application Review | Pro | $150 a month, 500 reviews a month, unlimited users |
| Sourcing | Free | $0 per user, first 100 profiles sourced |
| Sourcing | Pro | $100 a month per user, 200 profiles a month |
| Sourcing | Max | $300 a month per user, unlimited profiles |
| Notetaker | Free | $0 per user, 25 calls a month |
| Notetaker | Pro | $60 a month per user, unlimited calls |
| All agents | Enterprise | Custom pricing |
Swipe to see the full comparison →
What Metaview Application Review costs per review
The Pro tier is $150 a month for 500 reviews a month. Divided out, that is $0.30 a review if you use the whole allowance. Use half of it and the effective cost doubles. This is our arithmetic on the listed figures, not a rate Metaview states.
The free tier covers 50 applications a month, which is one modest requisition. Anything larger lands on Pro or on a quote. The page does not say what happens when you pass 500 in a month, whether reviews stop, roll over or bill extra, so ask before a seasonal hiring spike.
The listed price is monthly, and the page does not show a yearly discount or a contract term for Pro. Ask whether the $150 holds on an annual agreement, and whether the review count resets each calendar month.
| Monthly applications | Metaview Application Review | Prescreener |
|---|---|---|
| Up to 50 | Free tier | Starter ranks up to 1,000 resumes |
| Up to 500 | $150 a month on Pro, $0.30 a review at full use | Starter, about $99 a month billed yearly |
| Over 500 | Not published, ask sales | Starter covers 1,000, then $199 to $2,490 monthly plans by volume |
Swipe to see the full comparison →
What Application Review does
Metaview describes Application Review as an agent that reviews inbound candidates against an Ideal Candidate Profile. You define what good looks like once, it evaluates the pipeline against that profile, and candidates land in fit buckets so the strongest show first. It lists real-time re-evaluation when you edit the profile, custom AI columns, and reasoning shown behind each evaluation.
It also states that humans always decide and that it never auto-rejects. That matches how Prescreener works, so the difference is not the principle. It is the surrounding product. Metaview sells Application Review as one agent in a recruiting platform alongside sourcing and interview notes, while Prescreener is built around reading and ranking resumes and nothing else.
The Metaview page quotes figures such as 92% reduced screening time and 10x recruiter capacity. These are the vendor's own marketing claims, not independent results, so ask for a pilot on your own requisitions before you rely on them.
| Capability | Metaview Application Review | Prescreener |
|---|---|---|
| Reads every inbound application | Yes, 24/7 review | Yes, every resume |
| Criteria you define | Ideal Candidate Profile | Written criteria per role |
| Shows the reasoning | Reasoning behind each evaluation | Written evidence per criterion |
| Auto-rejects candidates | No, humans decide | No, humans decide |
| Sources candidates | Separate Sourcing agent | Not offered |
| Records interviews | Separate Notetaker agent | Not offered |
Swipe to see the full comparison →
Where Metaview fits and where it does not
Metaview is worth a scope discussion when you want sourcing, inbound review and interview notes from one vendor, and your recruiters will use more than one of them. The per-user pricing on Sourcing and Notetaker suits small teams, and the free tiers let you test an agent before paying.
It is more than you need if the whole problem is reading the resumes already in your inbox. You would be choosing among three agents and a suite quote to buy one function. For another platform that bundles sourcing with review and sells by quote, see Gem pricing, and for the full range of what vendors publish, the ATS pricing comparison.
| Need | Metaview fit | Prescreener fit |
|---|---|---|
| Source passive candidates | Sourcing agent | Not offered |
| Take notes on interviews | Notetaker agent | Not offered |
| Rank inbound applications | Application Review agent | Core use case |
| Predictable resume screening bill | Per-review Pro tier, Enterprise by quote | Published price by applicant volume |
Swipe to see the full comparison →
Questions to ask on the Metaview call
Bring these to a demo and keep the answers beside the quote.
1. What happens when we pass 500 reviews in a month on Pro?
2. Does an applicant who is re-reviewed after an ICP edit count as a new review?
3. Is the $150 Pro price the same on an annual agreement?
4. Which of our ATS integrations are included, and are any billed separately?
5. How many users does Application Review allow, and do hiring managers need seats?
6. What does the all-agents suite cost for our headcount?
7. Can we pilot Application Review on live requisitions before committing?
Rank inbound resumes with a screening price you can budget
If the bottleneck is the inbound pile, define success as every resume read and ranked with reasons you can check. Prescreener does that with written evidence per criterion, and a person decides what happens next. Use bulk applicant screening for the reading backlog, or application scoring software for criterion-based ranking.
Prescreener pricing is $199, $499, $1,290 or $2,490 a month by applicant volume, or half that billed yearly. Starter is about $99 a month billed yearly for 1,000 resumes ranked monthly. That gives you a concrete screening number to hold beside Metaview's $150 for 500 reviews.
| Purchase | Price evidence | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Metaview Application Review Pro | $150 a month, 500 reviews | Inbound review agent |
| Prescreener monthly plans | $199, $499, $1,290 or $2,490 a month | Inbound resume ranking by applicant volume |
| Prescreener yearly billing | Half the monthly price | Inbound resume ranking by applicant volume |
| Prescreener Starter billed yearly | About $99 a month for 1,000 resumes ranked monthly | Evidence per criterion with human review |
Swipe to see the full comparison →
Good questions
Questions about metaview pricing
Explore more
More ways hiring teams screen with Prescreener
Gem recruiting pricing
Gem publishes no price for companies over 100 employees. The only figures on gem.com/pricing are startup tiers for small teams, so budget the sourcing and CRM platform separately from reading the applicants already in your ATS.
Learn moreFindem pricing
Findem publishes no price on its own site. The only list price anywhere is $25,000 for a 12-month Talent License on AWS Marketplace, Vendr's buyer data puts the median contract at $58,000 a year, and its newest product charges per candidate you unlock. Here is every figure graded, and what it costs to have Findem screen your applicants.
Learn moreSeekOut pricing
SeekOut publishes one price: Recruit Core at $149 a month paid annually up front, or $179 billed monthly, with a 14-day free trial. Every other tier is quoted, and AI inbound screening is not on Core at all. Here is what SeekOut states, what Vendr's buyer data shows, and what it costs to have SeekOut read your applicants.
Learn morehireEZ pricing
hireEZ publishes one price: $494 a month for a solo recruiter, with a 7-day free trial. Team and enterprise pricing is set by quote against the tools hireEZ replaces. Here is what hireEZ states, what Vendr's buyer data shows, where the $169 and $199 seat figures come from, and what hireEZ's Applicant Review does with your inbound pile.
Learn moreHumanly pricing
Humanly publishes no plan price. Its pricing address shows a Page not found screen and every button books a demo. The only figures Humanly prints sit on a limited-time offer page: $3 to $30 per AI video interview and $10K per role for human sourcing. Here is what those numbers buy, what a quote depends on, what other hourly hiring platforms print, and what it costs to rank every inbound resume first.
Learn moreGlider AI pricing
Glider AI pricing starts with a demo, not a published rate. Capterra and SelectHub list a $299 monthly starting figure, but that is third-party information. Here is what Glider sells, what to ask about the quote and how ranking resumes first can reduce the candidate volume sent into paid assessments and interviews.
Learn moreStop reading the inbound pile by hand. Put screening on autopilot.
Set your role and criteria and Prescreener parses every inbound resume, scores role-fit, and ranks the pile for your team. Prescreener ranks and flags candidates, your recruiters make every hiring decision.
Consistent criteria · impact ratio reports for your bias audit · human-in-the-loop